Biden’s Preemptive Pardons Could Backfire, Experts Warn
Investigative journalist Matt Taibbi has raised concerns that President Joe Biden’s preemptive pardons for figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci, former Rep. Liz Cheney, and others may have unintended consequences.
In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson (Watch video below) , Taibbi suggested that these pardons could actually make it easier to uncover potential wrongdoing rather than protecting those involved.
Legal experts note that once someone is pardoned, they can no longer invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination if called to testify before Congress or a grand jury.
This means individuals who received pardons could be compelled to answer questions under oath.
According to Taibbi, the pardons raise red flags.
“When we see someone getting a pardon, we have to ask why. It suggests there may be serious crimes involved,” he explained.
Federal litigation attorney Jesse Binnall echoed these concerns, pointing out that while the pardons shield recipients from prosecution for past actions, they do not protect them from perjury charges if they lie under oath.
He described the situation as “great news” for those seeking accountability.
Critics argue that Washington, D.C. is a politically biased venue unlikely to convict high-profile figures on perjury charges.
As a result, some experts suggest moving testimony and depositions outside the capital to ensure a fair legal process.
Former President Donald Trump also weighed in, questioning Biden’s decision to pardon Cheney and others associated with the January 6th committee.
“Why are we helping people like Milley and Cheney?” he asked, referring to former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley, who was also granted a pardon.
As investigations continue, legal analysts suggest Biden’s move may have opened new doors for scrutiny rather than closing them.
Whether this strategy protects its intended recipients or leads to further legal challenges remains to be seen.
